Schumer: Democrats will filibuster Gorsuch nomination – Washington Post

By Ed O’Keefe, Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow,
Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Trump’s pick to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, faced a critical blow on Thursday as Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he would join with other Democrats in attempting to filibuster the nomination — a move that could complicate his confirmation and lead to a total revamp of how the U.S. Senate conducts its business.
Since last year’s elections, Democrats have threatened to force Trump’s Supreme Court nominees to clear procedural hurdles requiring at least 60 senators to vote to end debate and proceed to a confirmation vote. Republicans are eager to confirm Gorsuch before an Easter recess next month, but with no Democrat expressing support for Gorsuch, they have threatened to change Senate rules to ensure the judge’s swift confirmation — a move that would allow Supreme Court picks to be confirmed with a simple majority vote.
On Thursday, Schumer warned that they should focus instead on changing Trump’s nominee.
“If this nominee cannot earn 60 votes — a bar met by each of President Obama’s nominees, and George Bush’s last two nominees — the answer isn’t to change the rules. It’s to change the nominee,” he said.
It is not clear that Democrats have the votes to block Gorsuch and to keep Republicans from changing the chamber’s way of doing business. But Schumer’s announcement is likely to further politicize an already divided Congress. In the last 47 years of Supreme Court nominations — spanning the appointments of the 16 most recent justices — only Samuel A. Alito Jr. was forced to clear the 60-vote procedural hurdle to break a filibuster.
In a Senate floor speech, Schumer said that Gorsuch “was unable to sufficiently convince me that he’d be an independent check” on Trump. He said later that the judge is “not a neutral legal mind but someone with a deep-seated conservative ideology. He was groomed by the Federalist Society and has shown not one inch of difference between his views and theirs.”
The Federalist Society, a conservative legal group, was one of two organizations that provided a list of names to Trump to consider for his Supreme Court nomination. One of the group’s top leaders, Leonard Leo, is on leave from the organization as he advises Trump on the Supreme Court confirmation process and other picks to fill vacancies on the federal appeals courts.
Schumer’s opposition was widely expected, given his leadership of a party facing increased pressure to block all of Trump’s nominees and policy decisions. But his speech did not include calls for the rest of his chamber to join him in opposition — a sign that he is leaving political space for certain Democrats to find ways to work with Republicans, if necessary. Several Democrats are facing political pressure from conservative organizations bankrolling a multimillion-dollar ad campaign designed to bolster Gorsuch.
In his speech, Schumer echoed the frustrations of Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee who have struggled to extract answers from Gorsuch this week on specific legal issues or past Supreme Court cases.
Gorsuch “declined to answer question after question after question with any substance. . . . All we have to judge the judge on is his record,” Schumer said.
In addition to Schumer, Sens. Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.) and Robert Casey (D-Pa.) also announced on Thursday that they would filibuster Gorsuch. Both are up for reelection next year. Casey is one of 10 Democratic senators running next year from states that Trump won in the presidential election and who are facing increased pressure from Republicans to work with them on the president’s priorities.
The Judicial Crisis Network, which is spending at least $10 million on TV ads to pressure Democratic senators, said that Casey and other Democrats “are proving that they are totally unreasonable when it comes to judicial nominations, and that they will obstruct anyone who does not promise to rubber stamp their political agenda from the bench.”
Senior Republicans have vowed that Gorsuch will be confirmed no matter what — a veiled threat to Democrats that they might use the so-called nuclear option to change the way senators confirm Supreme Court justices.
“If Judge Gorsuch can’t achieve 60 votes in the Senate, could any judge appointed by a Republican president be approved with 60 or more votes in the Senate?” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said this week.
Among recent Supreme Court nominees, Obama’s choices of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan each received more than 60 votes. Alito, chosen by President George W. Bush, was confirmed 58-42 in 2006, but 72 senators voted to defeat a possible filibuster.
In 2013, Democrats angered by GOP resistance to Obama’s nominees changed the chamber’s rules so that executive branch nominees and picks to serve on lower federal courts could be confirmed with simple majority votes. Supreme Court nominations were not included in the rules change.
Much of the Democratic resistance to Gorsuch centers on the GOP’s decision last year to block consideration of Judge Merrick Garland, Obama’s choice to replace the late Antonin Scalia.
But moderate Democrats facing pressure to support Gorsuch have said they are hoping that both parties can come to an agreement that leads to Gorsuch’s confirmation and the preservation of current Senate traditions.
“If the Senate goes to a 51-vote threshold, I’m not really sure who wants to be in the Senate at that time or what’s the purpose,” Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), a key moderate Democrat, said at a Washington Post Live event on Wednesday.
Polls show more Americans support than oppose Gorsuch’s nomination, though many have no opinion. Most recently, an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll last month found 32 percent supporting Gorsuch, while 20 percent were opposed and nearly half said they don’t know enough or have no opinion (48 percent). Gorsuch so far has earned less public support than past nominees.
But support for Democratic attempts to block Gorsuch varies. A Quinnipiac University survey last month found that 65 percent of registered voters believe Senate Democrats should allow a vote on Gorsuch’s nomination; 25 percent said they should prevent such a vote. But a CNN-ORC poll found 51 percent of adults believe Senate Democrats would be justified in blocking an up-or-down vote if “all or most of the Democrats in the Senate opposed Gorsuch’s nomination.”
After two days of answering senators’ questions, Gorsuch stepped out of the hot seat on Thursday as his confirmation hearing shifted to testimony from those who support and oppose his nomination.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said Gorsuch had demonstrated a “great command of the law” and humility in his testimony, and that Thursday would likely be the final day of hearings. Republicans are hoping to refer Gorsuch to the full Senate by April 3.
Gorsuch was not present as he was alternately praised for his independence and intelligence, and criticized as a threat to working people, the environment, children with disabilities and national security by those who testified before the committee. Throughout the day, nearly 30 people spanning the ideological spectrum were set to testify before the committee on Gorsuch’s record.
Judge John Kane, a fellow Colorado judge, assured the committee that Gorsuch knows that his social, political and religious views have no place on the bench.
“Gorsuch is not a monk, but neither is he a missionary or an ideologue,” Kane said.
Human rights advocates raised concerns on Thursday about Gorsuch’s tenure at the Justice Department during George W. Bush’s presidency, when he worked on cases related to the detention of terrorism suspects. Gorsuch helped draft language designed to support Bush’s claims of executive authority on matters of torture and the treatment of detainees.
Gorsuch told the committee this week that he was merely acting as an attorney for his then-client.
“Judge Gorsuch was closely involved in developing and defending these claims,” Jameel Jaffer, head of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, told the committee.
“It is not the case . . . that Judge Gorsuch happened to be a government lawyer at a time when the government — his client — endorsed torture and a sweeping view of presidential power. The government endorsed those things first, very publicly, and then Judge Gorsuch chose his client.”
Whether Gorsuch would be willing to stand up to overreach by the president as the ninth justice, Jaffer said, is particularly important at a time when Trump has put in place an executive order banning travel to the United States by immigrants from six majority-Muslim counties and has said he would consider prosecuting U.S. citizens in the military commissions at Guantánamo.
The committee also heard a highly personal account directly from Jeff Perkins, the father of a child with autism whom Gorsuch ruled against in 2008. Perkins called the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit “devastating,” requiring one parent to move to another school district to get his son, Luke, the education he needed.
[Supreme Court sets higher bar for education of students with disabilities]
“Judge Gorsuch felt that an education for my son that was even one small step above insignificant was acceptable,” Perkins said.
Gorsuch’s 2008 decision came under scrutiny on Wednesday after the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in another case that the standard Gorsuch applied for assessing the educational benefit for students with disabilities was too low.
Deanell Reece Tacha, a former 10th Circuit judge, defended Gorsuch’s position in the 2008 case, saying he was following long-standing precedent in applying a standard that was also used by most other appellate courts. She called Gorsuch the “gold standard in public service.”
Scott Clement contributed to this report.
Read more at PowerPost
Source: Yahoo

43 thoughts on “Schumer: Democrats will filibuster Gorsuch nomination – Washington Post

  • 22nd November 2020 at 6:29 pm

    We absolutely love your blog and find most of your post’s to be just what I’m looking for.
    Do you offer guest writers to write content
    for yourself? I wouldn’t mind composing a post or elaborating on a
    few of the subjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome web site!

  • 26th November 2020 at 8:44 pm

    Howdy, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i
    was just curious if you get a lot of spam comments?
    If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so
    any help is very much appreciated.

  • 14th December 2020 at 2:36 am

    Taxi moto line
    128 Rue la Boétie
    75008 Paris
    +33 6 51 612 712  

    Taxi moto paris

    Hello! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble
    with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up
    losing months of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any
    solutions to protect against hackers?

  • 14th December 2020 at 2:51 am

    Hi, everything is going well here and ofcourse every one is sharing
    data, that’s actually good, keep up writing.

  • 15th December 2020 at 1:33 am

    M.E.C Mon Electricien Catalan
    44 Rue Henry de Turenne
    66100 Perpignan

    Electricien Perpignan

    If you want to obtain a great deal from this piece of writing then you have to apply these techniques to your
    won website.

  • 16th December 2020 at 3:01 pm

    Independance Immobilière – Agence Dakar Sénégal
    Av. Fadiga, Immeuble Lahad Mbacké
    BP 2975 Dakar
    +221 33 823 39 30

    Agence Immobilière Dakar

    I’ll right away take hold of your rss as I can not in finding your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service.
    Do you’ve any? Please let me understand in order that I could subscribe.

  • 25th December 2020 at 11:07 pm

    This web site is usually a walk-through it really is the knowledge you desired about this and didn’t know who to inquire about. Glimpse here, and you’ll undoubtedly discover it.

  • 27th December 2020 at 12:45 am

    you’ve got an important blog here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my weblog?

  • 27th December 2020 at 6:28 pm

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything similar to this before. So nice to locate somebody by original thoughts on this subject. realy appreciation for starting this up. this website can be something that is needed on the net, someone with a bit of originality. helpful task for bringing a new challenge towards the net!

  • 28th December 2020 at 1:04 am

    Many thanks taking a few minutes to discuss this unique, I find myself passionately with this and also adoration looking over on that problem. Just in case likely, since complete specialist knowledge, on earth would you feelings modernizing your main internet page along with other facts? This is very helpful for me.

  • 30th December 2020 at 10:17 pm

    I have a hard time describing my thoughts on content, but I really felt I should here. Your article is really great. I like the way you wrote this information.

  • 1st January 2021 at 6:45 pm

    Great website! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am bookmarking your feeds also

  • 3rd January 2021 at 11:26 pm

    An intriguing discussion will probably be worth comment. I do believe that you can write regarding this topic, may possibly not often be a taboo subject but generally individuals are inadequate to communicate on such topics. Yet another. Cheers

  • 15th January 2021 at 8:13 am

    Hello would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re
    utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different web browsers and I must say this blog loads
    a lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good web hosting
    provider at a reasonable price? Thanks, I appreciate it!

  • 21st March 2021 at 10:26 am

    I take pleasure in, result in I discovered just what I was taking a look for.
    You have ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man.
    Have a nice day. Bye

  • 10th May 2021 at 5:40 am

    Hi there to every body, it’s my first visit of this blog; this blog carries amazing and in fact good material
    in support of readers.

  • 10th May 2021 at 1:20 pm

    Have you ever heard of second life (sl for short). It is essentially a video game where you can do anything you want. sl is literally my second life (pun intended lol). If you would like to see more you can see these Second Life articles and blogs

  • 11th May 2021 at 5:31 am

    Its not my first time to visit this web page, i am visiting
    this site dailly and obtain pleasant information from here every day.

  • 28th August 2021 at 5:30 pm

    [url=]viagra canada drugstore[/url] [url=]buy cialis 10mg online[/url] [url=]zithromax buy online no prescription[/url] [url=]ivermectin 250ml[/url] [url=]purchase cialis online no prescription[/url] [url=]generic name for ivermectin[/url] [url=]can you buy viagra[/url] [url=]buy tadalafil in india[/url]

  • 6th September 2021 at 10:51 pm

    [url=]stromectol liquid[/url]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.